PPM, what is it and is it possible?
(Published October 2003 in Die Casting Management magazine)
By: Bob McClintic, Die Casting Consultant

“PPM” stands for “parts per million”.
It has become a commonly used method for measuring quality performance on
anything from castings to successful take off and landings by airlines.
Definition:
One PPM means one (defect or event) in a million or 1/1,000,000.
Don’t confuse this with the volumetric
measurement used to record components in gases and liquids. There was a time
when you were considered a “pretty good supplier” when your defect rate was
less than 1%, (10,000 PPM), and then the expectation was increased to 0.1%
or 1,000 PPM. Now the rate for most automotive components is targeted at 25
PPM or 0.0025%
To calculate: For example, let's
say you had 25 pieces defective in a shipment of 1,000 pieces. 25/1000= .025
or 2.5% defective. .025 X 1,000,000 = 25,000 PPM.
A vehicle built with thousands of components at 10,000 PPM
would be subject to several visits to the repair shop for corrections. Indeed,
we have come to expect improved reliability from our vehicles.
So what does this have to do with die castings?
25 PPM or Six Sigmatm is the measure applied to most automotive
and commercial suppliers. According to an August
20, 2000 article in Industry Week, Six Sigmatm would
only allow 3.4 PPM. In order to accomplish
this requires total cooperation of management, engineering, sales and operations.
Training and education are essential. For example, let say you are a supplier
producing 10,000,000 castings a year. At 25 PPM, that would mean your total
acceptable defects for that year would be 250. For the average plant that
means one bad part per day. Period!
Some would say this is impossible in the die casting
process. To approach this level of quality requires a different approach than
the one that produced 5 and 10% scrap. What are the benefits to reducing scrap
and returns?
I know of at least one company who has taken on
the challenge and has a record of 14 PPM on heavily machined castings. This
is no small task as they are supplying millions of castings per year. They
will agree that it requires constant vigilance and training at all levels.
It is the result of a team effort, not a one man show.
Most companies contain a plant within a plant.
The second plant produces all the waste. One example of a plant that was producing
high scrap also experienced excessive machine down time. Usually they are
present and feed on the other. Together they created a situation that required
the facility to operate 24/7/365. By correcting the tooling, equipment and
infrastructure problems that repeatedly broke down and by training the operators
and technical personnel, we were able to eliminate an entire shift and go
to five day weeks. The down time and scrap issues were the equivalent of 33%
of every thing produced. Cash flow took on a new meaning as machines no longer
had to run as long to produce the necessary castings. Machine and tool component
life seemed to increase as a higher percentage of the product was usable.
As the improvements were implemented, the roving
inspection was eliminated and the responsibility was given to the operators.
Because they were present at the machine for most of the shift, they could
identify problems in a more timely fashion than an inspector who only checked
the castings on an hourly basis. Real-time inspection of the process must
be associated with process control. Not just measuring scrap, but monitoring
the “key” process variables.
According to Philip Crosby, “Insanity is doing
things the same way we've always done them and expecting different results”.
My approach has been, “If you don't measure it
you can not control it.”
The monitoring and measurement systems we have
today have paved the way for improved quality. We can now control the process
in order to control the quality. Quality can not be inspected in after the
fact. It is the result of careful planning, design, and execution.
Additional information on mistake proofing, six
sigma and related articles are available from the American Society for Quality
web site. http://www.asq.org
Bob McClintic
October 25, 2003

Other technical
articles on die casting by Bob McClintic
Return to
Home page
E-mail Bob at: RMcClintic@DrDieCast.com
Copyright Bob McClintic and Associates: 2000, 2003
Copyright:
McClintic and Associates, 1998 – 2003
Revised:
November
24, 2003