“Failing to plan” or “planning to fail?”

(This article was also published in the June 2002 issue of

“Die Casting Management” magazine.)

Throughout the die casting industry, it is customary for the die cast operators to keep a putty knife handy to scrape flash off the die faces. Many operators even keep them in their hip pockets, for convenience. Sometimes, I have found it almost impossible to even find a putty knife in the possession of an operator.

While flash may be a fact of life of our process, it is not acceptable in the levels we often tolerate.

Some misconceptions concerning flash:

1. It helps vent the die. Wrong!, it allows uncontrolled loss of cavity pressure. It increases the thickness of the casting, the gates, and the overflows adding weight that is not in the quote.

2. It doesn't cost anything. Wrong!, Flash is only 20% recoverable, if that. On a recent automotive casting for example, we "spotted the die" to correct the flash problem. The machine had an auto ladle, so it poured the same amount of metal after the repair as it did before. However when we started back up, the biscuit was 1 inch longer than it was before we "spotted the die". We were running a 3 1/2" tip. Therefore, we were loosing 9.621 cubic inches of metal every shot. That is .9621 lbs. of metal every shot! The casting was scheduled to run 8,000 pieces. /wk. at 4 cavity (which we were seldom able to do during that period, because of the problems caused by flash.) 8,000 pcs./4 cavity = 2,000 shots X 50 weeks =100,000 shots/year. X .9621 lbs. /shot =96,210 lbs./ year X $.75/lb. metal = $72,157 /year in metal X .80 (80% lost metal) = $57,726 net loss /year due to flash on this single job.

A die that flashes .025 inch with a projected area of 94 square inches like this automotive casting, has 3.4 cubic inches of excess material. That is .34 lbs. per shot excess material. Let's say that the die runs 100,000 shots per year like this casting. That is an extra 34,000 lbs. of metal which we pay for and is not included in the quote. 34,000 lbs. X $.75/lb. =$25,500 /year!

Trim thickness can also be a major cause of quality problems. If a slide flashes, such as happened frequently on another automotive component, it can result in trim shear. If die repair relieves the trim die while the die is flashing, then when the slide blow condition is corrected, there will be excessive trim burr remaining.

In addition, scrap generated from lost cavity pressure results in internal porosity that is not visible from the surface. Generally, it is revealed when the casting is machined. There may be other processes prior to machining which add additional cost to the casting. These might include such operations as vibratory finish, as for the another automotive valve, shot blasting as performed on a variety of castings, or painting as done to other castings, etc. The painting on some castings nearly doubles the cost of the casting to that point! Machining occurs as a final operation. At this time 2/3 of the selling price is in the outside operations of paint and machining.

If the defects reach the customer before they are detected, the cost of correction is further increased. We must pay travel costs, plus wages for sorting or rework in a customers facility. Travel cost alone to a nearby customer can run at least $250. Time away from the die casting plant to address the problem could be a minimum of 1 1/2 days. In addition, there are corrective action meetings to explain the cause of the defect, and to describe procedures for prevention in the future. The meetings add additional cost to the defective castings.

3. "I can't afford to fix it". See above. The direct cost to correct the flashing problem described above, was one person, one shift. $15./hr X 8 hrs. =$120. "If you can't afford to fix it, you can't afford to run it".

Other problems resulting from flash:

1. On dies with slides, flash accumulates under the slides, keeps the slide from fully seating, and results in dimensional problems. Example, on an automotive control valve. When the slide is backed out, the valve seat has excessive machine stock, and we give away metal. The cam lock holds the die open allowing additional flash, which accelerates the accumulation of flash under the slide.

2. Flash accumulation under a slide can lead to compound damage on the die. One example of this is broken horn pins. This can also damage both the slide carrier and the key ways.

3. Safety: We have all experienced the discomfort of being burned by flying flash. In most cases, this is minor. However, worst case can result in lost time injuries and lost time.

4. Housekeeping: Much of the "trash" beneath the dies and on the floors around the die cast machines is flash. It becomes contaminated with die lube, tip lube, hydraulic fluid, die heater fluid, and water. This makes it virtually unusable as remelt. This is where a lot of the 80% number comes from in item 1. above.

5. Lost time from restarts: Accumulated over a 24 hour period, this can be a huge impact on quality, and productivity. Each restart can result in at least one and sometimes as many as three cold "start up" shots. They are either thrown out by the operator, which is the correct procedure, or later at machining after adding additional value to the casting.

If you need help solving flash problems and want to improve your bottom line profitability, contact us for on-site assistance.

Bob McClintic

February 28, 2000

Other technical articles on die casting by Bob McClintic

Return to Home page

 

E-mail Bob at: RMcClintic@DrDieCast.com

Copyright Bob McClintic and Associates: 2000, 2002

Copyright: McClintic and Associates, 1998 – 2003

Revised: February 8, 2003

 

(Published June 2003 issue, Die Casting Management” magazine)

The die casting clamping mechanism is a mechanical marvel that multiplies force by approximately 33::1 while providing a die stroke roughly equal to that of the closing cylinder. Despite the demands on the system, most clamping mechanisms make millions of cycles without failure.

 

Success is not an accident. In order to produce die castings with quality consistent enough to approach PPM levels, it is necessary to have a method to maintain the entire clamp system. It is a key component of process control.

 

Components of a clamp mechanism:

 

What are some of the common causes of failure?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In summary, the maintenance of the mechanical system of the machine is essential to producing quality casting consistently year after year.  While it does require effort and investment, the cost is minimal in comparison to the cost of neglect.

 

Notes:

1 Alofs, W., Carstens, J., “Mechanical Maintenance and Evaluation of Die Cast Machines,” NADCA, 1987

 Bob McClintic
May 28, 2003

Other technical articles on die casting by Bob McClintic

Return to Home page

 

E-mail Bob at: RMcClintic@DrDieCast.com

Copyright Bob McClintic and Associates: 2000, 2003

Copyright: McClintic and Associates, 1998 – 2003

Revised: November 24, 2003

 

It’s an old adage, true even in the die casting industry. Where does it start? As I have stated in previous articles, it should start with product design and development. It also continues in the quoting stage. “What?” you say! Make the sales department responsible for the success of a casting project? Why not! Some castings are much easier to sell then they are to produce. Is there a simple solution? Success is more likely with a mutual commitment between the designer, purchaser and producer. Complex, engineered castings have forced the die casting industry to improve their machine, tooling, engineering and process capabilities in recent years. In many ways, we have not all adapted to the shift from castings resulting from collaboration between the customers design and manufacturing engineers and the die casting supplier. Commodity buyers have replaced technical purchasing specialists. Brokers have introduced communication layers between the supplier and the final user that can inhibit the engineer and sales from properly defining quality and functional requirements. This can result in disappointed customers and frustrated suppliers. Going “off-shore” for solutions only makes it more difficult.

 What then does a good project look like? 

  1. The designers will solicit design and manufacturing input from the casting suppliers during the concept stage of the design.
  2. Purchasing departments will select qualified suppliers based on “on-site” visits and surveys. Qualifications will be based on:
    1. Quality
    2. On-time performance
    3. Engineering support
    4. Price
    5. A record of successful project management
  3. When the quote arrives the sales department will solicit input from the key departments including:
    1. Quality
    2. Manufacturing

                                                              i.      Die Casting

                                                            ii.      Machining/finishing

    1. Engineering

                                                              i.      Tooling

                                                            ii.      Process

    1. Finance
  1. If the above team deems the project as technically “high risk” it may be necessary to perform a flow and/or solidification simulation before completing the quote. Since this represents a significant financial commitment, this may be an item the customer would be willing to pay for.
  2. At the least, the quote procedure should include calculating the process parameters. This will often forecast the ability of the machine to successfully produce the castings. This would include the following parameters:
    1. Number of cavities
    2. Physical size of the die (mold) and fit in the machine(s) to be used.
    3. Cavity pressure
    4. Locking tonnage
    5. Cavity fill time
    6. Metal melting and holding capacity.

While the above steps are not a final guarantee of 100% success, they do greatly improve the company’s chances for a successful build and launch.

 For assistance with your project, contact us by one of the following methods.

The above article was first published in “Die Casting Management” magazine, October 2002.

 Return to “Technical articles Index page”.

Return to Home page

Contact information:

Bob McClintic and Associates

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49428 USA

Ph: 616-292-0454

Fax: 616-669-7884

E-mail: RMcClintic@DrDieCast.com

 Copyright Bob McClintic and Associates: 1993 to 2003

Revised: February 8, 2003